clock menu more-arrow no yes mobile

Filed under:

NHL Playoff Teams Versus Other Playoff Teams

New, 8 comments

The Stanley Cup playoffs are about to start and fans and the media alike will offer their predictions. Usually people will look at two sorts of numbers when forecasting the playoffs. They will look at the head-to-head numbers between teams facing each other in the 1st round or they tend to focus on the overall regular season numbers. (EDIT: Big Picture Guy has a fanpost showing that head-to-head series are not a strong predictor) (also click here for the Western Conference)

There are problems with either approach. The head-to-head numbers contain a tiny sample size and therefore they can be skewed by injuries, streaks or random luck. On the other hand, the full season numbers can also be deceptive because none of the playoff teams will find the Islanders or Colorado on their post-season schedule. From this point forward every post-season game will be against a quality opponent.

My approach to this problem is to look at a slice of data that falls in between these two extremes. What if we looked at those games in which a club faced another playoff qualifier? For most NHL teams, roughly half their regular season games were versus another playoff club. With the start of the playoffs the NHL drops from a 30 team league to a 16 team league. If we look at the P-NHL (playoff NHL) which teams look strong and which ones look weak?

Before we look at the actual numbers for the P-NHL, it is important to note that in the post-season there are no bonus points for an Over Time Loss or a Shoot Out Win. So I have eliminated these extra points to make the regular season as comparable as possible to the playoffs. In other words the "old school" NHL Standings system.


Games VS

Playoff Teams

Wins Losses Ties
BOS 40 22 12 6
WSH 39 21 11 7
NJD 43 21 19 3
PIT 45 20 18 7
PHI 43 15 21 6
CAR 40 18 16 6
NYR 44 16 22 6
MON 40 13 20 7



Beating the Tough Opponents

The table below contains three columns showing three different ways to assess the East playoff teams. In column one we find the official regular season standings. In column two we see those same standing with the "bonus points" stripped away. In column three we see each team's win % against only playoff teams projected over a full 82 games (with no bonus points for OTL or SOW)


Final East Standings

with SOW and OTL

East Standings

without SOW and OTL

East Standings

Versus Playoff Team

without SOW, OTL

BOS 116 108 103
WSH 108 101 103
NJD 106 98 86
PIT 99 90 86
PHI 99 90 69
CAR 97 92 86
NYR 95 82 71
MON 93 82 68

Analysis: Once you remove the bonus standing points for Shoot Out Wins and Over Time Losses and look only a playoff team versus playoff team contests the standing begin to look quite different. The top teams Boston and Washington stand well ahead of the pack. In the middle we find Carolina, New Jersey and Pittsburgh. Bringing up the rear are Philadelphia, Montreal and the Rangers. The Flyers in particular played rather poorly against the better teams and in the PNHL they would have have finished last 8th instead of tied for 4th.

Offense and Defense

If you simply look at the overall point standings for the East, those numbers fail to convey how badly the Flyers beat up on non-playoff clubs. To get a better sense of this pattern, the table below shows the Goals For (GFA) and the Goals Against Average (GAA) and Goal Differential (GDiff) for each Eastern Club broken down into games played against other playoff teams and those played against non-playoff teams.

Team Name
GFA VS Playoff Teams GAA VS Playoff Teams Goal Diff VS Playoff Team GFA VS Non-Playoff Teams GAA VS Non-Playoff Team Goal Diff VS Non-Playoff Teams
BOS 3.03 2.15 +.88 3.55 2.48 +1.07
WSH 3.05 2.74 +.31 3.47 3.09 +.37
PIT 2.93 2.78 +.16 3.41 2.92 +.49
NJD 2.63 2.77 -.14 3.21 2.26 +.95
CAR 2.45 2.60 -.15 3.29 2.79 +.50
PHI 2.86 3.09 -.23 3.51 2.54 +.97
MON 2.65 2.93 -.28 3.24 2.93 +.31
NYR 2.52 2.89 -.36 2.34 2.24 +.11


Analysis: The Boston Bruins and Washington Capitals torched both playoff teams and non-qualifiers. On the other hand, the Flyers and Devils really loaded up on standings points while taking on the weaker NHL clubs. Only the Bruins, Caps and Penguins managed to accumulate a positive goal differential when playing other playoff clubs.

Team Efficiency and Special Teams

We can take this a step further and look at a breakdown of how each playoff club did with respect to stopping shots (SV%) and converting shots in to goals (ST%) versus other playoff clubs. The same goes for special teams--which clubs were able to generate PP Goals even against good teams?

Team Name
Versus Save Percentage Shot Percentage Power Play Percentage Penalty Kill Percentage
BOS Playoff Teams .933 10.0% 20.8% 81.5%
BOS Non-Playoff .917 11.7% 26.3% 83.2%
WSH Playoff Teams .907 9.4% 23.6% 81.7%
WSH Non-Playoff .895 10.0% 26.7% 79.6%
NJD Playoff Teams .907 8.2% 15.3% 78.3%
NJD Non-Playoff .922 9,5% 22.7% 81.9%
PIT Playoff Teams .912 10.3% 15.5% 82.5%
PIT Non-Playoff .899 11.4% 19.3% 83.0%
PHI Playoff Teams .906 9.7% 19.1% 81.4%
PHI Non-Playoff .921 11.7% 26.8% 84.7%
CAR Playoff Teams .917 7.8% 17.3% 79.0%
CAR Non-Playoff .900 9.7% 20.1% 81.9%
NYR Playoff Teams .904 7.9% 14.0% 87.2%
NYR Non-Playoff ,923 7.1% 13.8% 88.7%
MON Playoff Teams .911 9.0% 18.0% 84.1%
MON Non-Playoff .904 10.6% 20.5% 80.9%


Analysis: The secret to the Bruins success against the better teams in the NHL was outstanding goaltending. As a team, the Bruins posted an outstanding .933 SV% against other playoff clubs. This is the best in the East by a long shot, 2nd place Carolina posted a .917 SV% against playoff teams.

One big warning sign in the SV% column can be found next to the Rangers. The club posted an excellent .923 SV% against the bottom teams but a very pedestrian .904 SV% against the top teams.

Another potential warning sign is that both the Rangers and Devils really struggled to convert shots into goals when facing playoff qualifiers. The Bruins and Penguins had the best ST% numbers versus playoff teams.

On the Power Play the Devils, Penguins and Flyers fared much worse on the man advantage when facing tougher opposition. The Flyers were an extreme case of this scorching non-playoff teams to the tune of 27% on the Power Play but posting a 19% number versus the playoff teams. The Devils also had an extreme split (23% vs 15%). The Rangers PP struggled no mater who they faced.

On the PK there are no huge splits--it would seem that a good PK works against about as well regardless of the quality of the opposition. The Ranges were outstanding while killing penalties no matter who they faced.

Summary: If we look at games in which playoff teams faced each other the Captials and Bruins clearly stand above the other Eastern Conference teams in these games. At the other end of the scale, the Flyers really struggled during the regular season when playing against teams that would go on to make the post-season.

Click here for the Western Conference