Can The Thrashawks Score Enough?

Right now it is very clear that the Thrashers lineup will be much more physical than in the past but the big question is can they score enough? I was worried about this as well so I created projections for every player.

Many people are just looking at the total points or goals scored by Ladd and Byfuglien and asking if they can REALLY replace the offense supplied by Kovalchuk, Kozlov, Afinogenov, Armstrong and Kubina. But you have to do a LOT more work to get a reasonable team projection.

The biggest adjustment is ice time. Last year Kovalchuk, Kozlov and Max played a ton of PP minutes. Those minutes have to be re-allocated to players like Evander Kane, Byfuglien and Ladd. So I did that for each player (see table below)


Nik Antropov  13.50 0.05 3.50 17.05
Niclas Bergfors  13.50 0.05 3.50 17.05
Rich Peverley  13.00 2.50 3.00 18.50
Evander Kane  13.00 2.00 3.00 18.00
Andrew Ladd 12.50 1.00 0.60 14.10
Bryan Little  13.00 0.05 3.00 16.05
Dustin Byfuglien 13.50 0.05 3.50 17.05
Clarke MacArthur  12.50 1.00 0.50 14.00
Jim Slater  12.00 2.00 0.05 14.05
Ben Eager 08.00 0.00 0.05 08.05
Todd White  12.00 1.00 0.05 13.05
Cormier/Pettersson 09.00 1.50 0.05 10.55
Chris Thorburn  08.00 2.50 0.05 10.55
Tobias Enstrom  17.50 1.00 4.00 22.50
Ron Hainsey  17.50 3.50 4.00 25.00
Zach Bogosian  17.50 1.00 4.00 22.50
Johnny Oduya  17.50 3.50 1.00 22.00
Brent Sopel 16.10 2.50 1.00 19.60
Arturs Kulda  11.00 1.70 0.05 12.75
Boris Valabik  11.00 1.50 0.05 12.55


Next step is to plug in realistic scoring rates for those ES, PP and SH minutes. I used last year's numbers for each player with some modifications. Namely, Evander Kane received only 22 minutes on the power play all season and didn't score, so I substituted the Thrashawks average PP scoring rate for his projection (aka mean substitution). I used the team average rate for all SH scoring rates because I think SH goals are mostly about SH TOI and luck. Finally, I had the problem of projecting the last forward spot (Cormier or Pettersson in my opinion) and my solution was just to give them Marty Reasoner's (low) scoring rates as a reasonable guess.

Once you adjust the ES, PP and SH ice time and plug in each player's scoring rate from last season, you get the following point projections. (see table below)


Player GP ES pts SH pts PP pts Total Points
Nik Antropov  76 43 0 21 63
Niclas Bergfors  76 43 0 6 49
Rich Peverley  76 31 2 14 46
Evander Kane  76 30 1 10 42
Andrew Ladd 76 37 1 1 38
Bryan Little  76 27 0 6 33
Dustin Byfuglien 76 20 0 11 32
Clarke MacArthur  76 25 1 1 27
Jim Slater  76 24 1 0 25
Ben Eager 76 22 0 0 22
Todd White  76 19 1 0 20
Cormier/Pettersson 72 13 1 0 14
Chris Thorburn  76 10 2 0 12
Tobias Enstrom  78 29 1 16 45
Ron Hainsey  78 19 2 16 37
Zach Bogosian  78 18 1 14 33
Johnny Oduya  78 24 2 3 30
Brent Sopel 78 8 2 3 12
Arturs Kulda  51 5 1 0 5
Boris Valabik  51 4 1 0 5


Like every projection this one will be wrong because the world has a stochastic element (unpredictable). Despite the randomness in the world all of us get up each morning and go to work--we  make assumptions that our world will not end (i.e. plans). The key (in life as well as stats) is to make reasonable projections.

Now I think Kane could destroy that 46 point projection and I think Nik Antropov will probably slip some from last season. I think Byfuglien could easily crush his projection (32 points) as well, but the Cormier/Pettersson slot might miss their estimate.

On the one hand, you could argue the power play will be less effective without Kovalchuk (likely) but you could also argue that responsible defensive hockey will lead to more counter-attack rushes (puck possession=more scoring chances), so right now I'm willing to call it a wash.

What do these individual estimates project in terms of a team total? Historically there are 2.7 points awarded for each NHL goal, so right now I have this Thrashers roster scoring 592 points which translates into 219 Goals or a 2.67 Goals For Average (16th overall) which would be a modest decline from last season's 2.80 Goals For (ranked 11th). That is an 11 goal decline from last season, so to make the playoffs and be a middle of the pack NHL team the Thrashers would need to make big progress in reducing their GAA from 3.05 (250 Goals Against) down to 220, a reduction of 30 goals allowed. I think that Ondrej Pavelec could easily take another big step forward and an improved commitment to team defense would help both Pavelec and newcomer Chris Mason.

My personal hunch is that the offense will beat my projection and come in closer to 230 goals for which would mean a reduction in Goals Allowed by 20 puts the Thrashers on playoff bubble boundary line.

Trending Discussions

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

Join Bird Watchers Anonymous

You must be a member of Bird Watchers Anonymous to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Bird Watchers Anonymous. You should read them.

Join Bird Watchers Anonymous

You must be a member of Bird Watchers Anonymous to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Bird Watchers Anonymous. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.