Jimmy Slater for Mr. January
I got a game-worn Jimmy Slater jersey for my wedding anniversary last year and I wave a giant Slater banner at Thrashers home games, so it’s no surprise that when my husband saw Falconer’s call for someone to pen a blog post about Slater’s recent performance, he looked to me.
I tried to protest, since I don’t have a mental list of stats and facts at the ready. I’m not enough of a hard-core hockey fan, I argued. But, my husband reasoned, I am at least a hard-core Slater fan.
One of the attributes that makes me a fan of the center seems to be a large contributor to his breakout play throughout January: non-stop hustle and an obvious passion for the sport. I realize there are plenty of "Slater haters" out there, largely because many feel that he hasn’t lived up to his first-round draft pick promise. Say what you will about talent, but no one has ever doubted Slater’s work ethic.
For the first half of the season, Slater was on the bubble of the roster, often finding himself the odd man out. He was a healthy scratch for 21 of the first 38 games of the season. That lack of consistent ice time—not to mention that demoralizing seat in the press box—is a recipe for making a player out of practice and out of spirits. Not so for Slater: fans heading to the Ice Forum to watch Thrashers practice often saw Slater on the ice after most of the team had called it a day. He worked on handling, getting pucks into the net and, yes, staying upright on his skates.
If Slater’s goal throughout January was to prove to John Anderson that he shouldn’t be on the scratch rotation, then mission accomplished. His determination and newfound confidence has turned into a stellar performance in January’s 14 games. In that time, he has scored six goals for a season total of seven. That’s seven goals in just 32 games, compared to just eight goals in 60 games during the 2008-09 season.
Slater scored two goals against the Pittsburgh Penguins, and his second goal against the Philadelphia Flyers was the game-winner, propelling the Thrashers back into a playoff spot.
For those of you thinking, "Sure, he’s been playing well, but it’s a team effort," you’re right. Slater has been especially effective since Anderson drastically changed the lines. First paired with Evander Kane and Bryan Little, and now Kane and Colby Armstrong, Slater seems to have found the right chemistry to really get going. He and Kane share speed, a solid work ethic and a tendency to head for the net.
It’s a pairing that has paid off for Kane, too. He’s been trying his solo wraparound move all season, usually without result. Both of Slater’s goals against Philly were the result of Kane adding a pass to Slater after his signature wraparound. Even Army, who seems to be struggling to find his stride this year, has scored two goals and one assist while on the ice with Kane and Slater. During the five games that the trio has been together, they have earned a total of 11 points, including five goals. (And I still say this line should be called the Slayer line.)
The hustle and results the Kane-Slater-Army line has been producing should be an example to the rest of the Thrashers. It’s refreshing to see that kind of passion on a nightly basis, shift after shift.
Slater is January’s featured player in my Thrashers calendar. Mr. January, indeed. When it comes to goals, Slater has only broken into the double digits once: he scored 10 during the 2005-06 season, his first as a Thrasher. At this rate, Slater will easily surpass his previous scoring record. Here’s hoping that Slater’s January lasts well into the playoffs.
0 recs |
7 comments
Comments
Thanks for the article, Beth
…and as far as stats go, I’ll give just one. Jimmy Slater ranks 2nd on the team (to a Mr. Ilya Kovalchuk) in a very important statistic: goals per unit ice time at even-strength.
That’s right, the only Thrasher who has scored more goals per minute on the ice at even-strength than Jimmy Slater is Ilya Kovalchuk.
Mr. January indeed.
by timmyf on Jan 29, 2010 5:25 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Surprise Stat #2
Kovalchuk is T-4th in +/-…
by timmyf on Jan 29, 2010 5:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Most Important
You left out the most important thing, Slater will actually chase the puck down and play defense. I will take a two way player over a goal only player.
by nerdsped on Jan 29, 2010 6:14 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Excellent guest poss there Beth. I’ve enjoyed your Slater/Slayer banner since spotting it late last season. Even more, I enjoyed watching Falconer try to get a photo of it when you first brought it out ;-)
by godsendjen on Jan 29, 2010 6:28 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
That was a very good article, Beth.
I admit that I have been highly critical of Slater over the years. Yes he is playing well now and I would keep him the lineup. Slater has done this get hot (in relative terms) in the 2nd half thing in his whole career after getting 0-1 goals in the first 41 games, so it’s hard for me to get really excited. However, a friend told me that he heard that Slater had been going to see a sports psychologist so perhaps he has turned a corner. I’m not sure that any of us should expect 20+ goals from him, but if he can turn into a solid 10-15 goal a season guy who can win face offs, there is no reason he can’t have a long career and stay in the NHL like Marty Reasoner. Slater’s goals on Thursday were “right place, right time” but I give him full credit as in previous seasons he was rarely in the right place and if he was he would just shoot and miss.
Jim Slater’s success should be a wake up call to Brian Little, but I think Little is still asleep.
by Zontar on Jan 30, 2010 11:10 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for the comments! Timmyf, those are definitely interesting stats. In his article about the Kane-Slater-Army line yesterday, Chris Vivlamore says Slater leads the NHL in face-offs won percentage. I know Slater wins a lot of his face-offs, but had no idea his win rate was so good.
by BethD on Jan 30, 2010 7:16 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
great article Beth Being a huge Slayer fan I love your sign
by msmith138 on Jan 30, 2010 8:04 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

























