Ownership Caused Two Month Delay in Kovalchuk Talks?
It appears that Dave Pagnotta of The Fourth Period has come across someone willing to talk about the Kovalchuk talks. Judging from the nature of the information, I'd venture a guess that it is someone from the Kovalchuk side of the table.
The key section in this article is that the following:
Kovalchuk, Grossman, Waddell and part owner Bruce Levenson all got together at the end of October to map out a game plan. According to a source, it was the first time the green light was given to start contract talks.
Instead of jumping at the chance to sign Kovalchuk right away, the team was focused on bringing in new investors and it took two months before contract negotiations finally picked up.
I'd love to say that I don't believe this quote, but I can't say that. This would not be the first time that Thrashers budgeting has been held up by indecisive ownership. GM Don Waddell is not going to throw his bosses under the bus, but his ability to engage in long, medium or even short term planning has been hampered at times by a lack of timely decisions about how much money he is allowed to spend. It is hard to formulate a multi-year plan if you don't even know how much money you can spend this year.
I can also confirm that Atlanta Spirit has been working hard to find new ownership. Prospective owners have been performing due diligence and kicking the tires. But there have been no announcements of additional partners so far. Any new ownership must be approved by the NHL Board of Governors and since there has been no public disclosure of new applicants to the BOG, I must infer that the efforts to add new ownership blood have come up empty to date.
It's a sad state of affairs for Thrashers fans really. On the one hand, Ilya Kovalchuk apparently wants to stay in Atlanta--but only if he is one of the highest paid players in the NHL. Personally, I wouldn't commit to paying more than 20% of my budget to a guy who only plays offense. On the other hand, the Thrashers ownership appears to be just as dysfunctional as when they were suing each other in court.
Earlier I blamed Don Waddell for waiting too long to fish or cut bait in the Kovalchuk talks, but it appears that ownership might be even more to blame for pushing the decision making process into December. Don Waddell certainly shares a large portion of credit or blame for the performance of this team, but even if the GM were replaced ownership problems would remain. (Do you think any potential rising star in the NHL management ranks would want to work for these superiors?) If ownership tells DW "sure you can sign Kovalchuk--just wait for us to get a new owner on board" well that certainly makes a decision to fish or cut bait more difficult.
And if anyone thinks that Don Waddell's plan was to have this drag out until the spring of 2010, here's what he said in the spring of 2009 when I asked if we could see a repeat of the Hossa saga:
I don't think [contract negotiations] will last all season. I think it will be pretty quick. For me the decision is "does Kovalchuk want to stay?" and if he wants to stay for the money--we can pay it or we can't. I think before the start of the year we will have this thing done, one way or the other--hopefully with him re-signed.
Stay tuned for more twists and turns.
0 recs |
14 comments
|
Comments
Kovalchuk may not be worth the money he’s asking, but that simply doesn’t matter anymore. Pagnotta’s right – Kovy will get paid, and he’ll get the term he wants. From the Thrashers’ perspective, they have a simple choice: give him what he wants or have this be message that is sent to every NHL player. And agent. And fan. Regardless of what the truth may be, I can’t see anything coming from this dysfunctional anarcho-syndicalist commune that can even come close to countering the effects of this and the rest of this negotiation.
Being a Thrashers fan - it's kind of like being punk rock in a hick town.
Birdwatchers Anonymous
I’m 100% in agreement with you. As The Falconer has pointed out, offense is a highly prized commodity in the NHL. The best 2 way players make big money, but they don’t make the biggest money. Like it or not, that’s how it is. And The Falconer has also pointed out that the Thrashers have to pay a “loser tax” for sucking. So it seems a bit much to me for the owners to cry about what Kovy wants to stay here. This is not a Hossa situation in that Kovy gave them his terms to stay and Hossa never did. The owners just don’t like what they are hearing. I have said all along that the owners have not been serious about the negotiations, but I felt that the reason was cheapness rather than delaying while trying to find a new partner.
My fear is that we’ll see the same old stuff every season from this team just like in the bad old days. Any free agents we have will be dealt at the trading deadline for prospects and nobody will want to stay here long term. Oh sure, we’ll pick up some good players in salary dumps, but they’ll leave as soon as they can. And the inevitable losing that follows will make our few good young players like Enstrom decide that they are not going to stick around and continue to play in Loser Town when they become unrestricted free agents.
Ah, if only the owners were an anarcho-syndicalist commune! That would be luxury! I am afraid that mentally they are bereft of life and have rung up the curtain and joined the Choir Invisible.
They’re just pining for the fjords.
Being a Thrashers fan - it's kind of like being punk rock in a hick town.
Birdwatchers Anonymous
I don’t think the issue is that ownership doesn’t want to pay Kovy what it’s asking – it’s that they can’t pay Kovy what he’s asking … at least not for more than a few years. It’s the fact that Kovy is pushing for a 10-13 year deal that’s spooked the owners. They can’t guarantee they’ll be able to afford that big contract down the road. Fact is, the non-Belkin owners are broke – it became obvious once Belkin started sitting on his money at the on-set of the lawsuit. It’s why the owners were so desperate to make the play-offs in 2007 (play-offs = big money.. when you aren’t swept out of the first round anyway). They were forced to bottom out the payroll and barely crept over the floor last season. The only reason $$ got spent this year is because Belkin was ordered to pony up his share of the past capital calls once the lawsuit got tossed this summer. But Belkin is still leaving and that leaves a 30% ownership hole that either the rest of Atlanta Spirit has to find another sucker to absorb or this whole thing is going to go belly-up. It’s frankly the scariest possible situation for Thrasher fans to find themselves in.
I still think he’s going to re-sign, but the repercussions of waiting so long and letting the rumors hit the press are doing nothing to help the situation. Free agents will continue to see ATL as unstable. If he doesn’t stay, good luck to Waddell in trying to hit the league minimum via free agency.
There will be some teams with cap issues next season without doubt. We’ll be able to take some players as salary dumps to make the minimum and perhaps move a couple underperforming players.
I’d rather have to work my way up to the minimum than below the maximum.
by timmyf on Jan 12, 2010 12:11 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Seriously, who’d want to buy into a sports franchise, dysfunctional or not, in these economic times?
by Black ice in Alabama on Jan 12, 2010 1:15 AM EST reply actions
I get into the games for free. Hell, I even park for free. But I’ve realized that until this organization makes an investment in my time – in me being a fan – that I’m not going to invest my time in them. I’ll be watching the game tonight on my (not HD-) TV.
by CuckooForKovalchuk on Jan 12, 2010 9:15 AM EST reply actions
The buck stops at the top.
Yes – in this economy – investing in Atlanta Spirit is lose-lose. They always were rolling the dice on the teams’ value increasing. But the world economy is de-levering now. So that idea doesn’t work. But whoever invests, will be subject to further cash calls, unless both basketball and hockey can be consistent contenders – and that is not a good bet.
Atlanta Hawks
I feel for the Atlanta Hawks, they’ll have the same issues with free agents this summer. While I think the NBA is an easier sell in the city (established product, long history), you wouldn’t know it by attendance numbers.
Kovy and Atlanta Thrashers
Been a Thrasher fan since inception. Very frustrating to say the least and to see some of our former players leave to thrive with other clubs has been painful. But what’s even more painful is seeing one of our brightest stars and team captain on his way out of this organization. I don’t blame him for leaving and will most likely support whichever team he moves to. Atlanta can’t support a superstar like Kovy… why, well the attendance is horrible, little local recognition and endorsements, and if we could afford to pay him – we couldn’t afford the supporting cast needed to excel in the league. We’ve become the Pittsburgh Pirates of Hockey sad to say. With that, I’m sure it wouldn’t be long before the team is sold and moved to Canada or a place where the fans would appreciate a professional hockey team.
Atlanta Spirit LLC
Please forgive the brevity, it’s 2am…
The owners need to take a hard look around at how other teams operate…seriously. In my opinion, they are main reason players are not looking to stay in Atlanta.
I love the Thrashers, but they have the worst owners in the NHL. Atlanta Spirit’s apathy and neglect for the Thrashers shines right through in everything they do. Jesus, they are cheap bastards!!
I’ll be praying for new ownership and a breath of fresh air for my Thrashers!

by 
























