How Much Money will the Thrashers Have to Spend this Summer?
The NHL Draft and start of the Free Agency period are only about 30 days away now, so it is time to think about the Thrashers options. The Thrashers cleared quite a bit of salary cap commitments off their books when they traded veterans Schneider, Havelid and Williams.
In my interview with Don Waddell he expressed interest in adding a top 4 defenseman and a top 6 forward through free agency or trades.Then in his interview with Ben Wright he stated that the team would have a budget in the neighborhood of $46 million.
According to www.nhlscap.com the Thrashers have a $31.6 cap commitment for next season. The Thrashers have several RFA (Lehtonen) and UFA (Reasoner) who need to be signed. Neither of them will receive enormous raises in my opinion. In order to get a handle on how the money works out I've some educated guesses. (Salmela has re-signed but the amount of money is unknown at this point).
In the table below I've handed out some modest raises to most of the RFA players. My educated guesses are enclosed by () in the table. Kari was paid $3 this last year. Top rated goalies like Kiprusoff make over $5 million. I don't think he will merit All-Star money but he probably will get a raise if he signs a multi-year deal with Atlanta, so I put him down for a cap hit of $4 million.
If my RFA and UFA guesses are close to the mark, the Thrashers will spend just over $40 million on 18 rosters spots. Last year their internal budget was around $45-46 million (they would have hit that total if they had not traded away veterans like Schneider).
| 1st Line | Kovalchuk | 6.3 | White | 2.4 | Little | 0.9 |
| 2nd Line | Kozlov | 3.7 | Peverley | 0.5 | UFA | ??? |
| 3rd Line | Stuart | 0.5 | Reasoner | (1.5) | Armstrong | (2.0) |
| 4th Line | Boulton | 0.6 | Slater | (0.8) | Thorburn | (0.8) |
| 1st Defense | Bogosian | 3.4 | Enstrom | 3.8 | ||
| 2nd Defense | Hainsey | 4.5 | UFA | ??? | ||
| 3rd Defense | Valabik | (1.0) | Exelby | 1.4 | Salmela | (0.9) |
| Goalies | Lehtonen | (4.0) | Hedberg | 1.1 |
If my educated guesses are close the Thrashers will have roughly $6 million in cap space. That is probably not enough money to sign a top 4 D and top 6 F on the UFA market.
Don Waddell indicated in the interview that he was considering dealing a goalie to fill one of the roster holes. Which goalie will be moved is unclear. I assume Lehtonen might net a bigger name prospect or player than Pavelec would. If he were to deal Lehtonen that would free up an addition $3 million in cap room (Lehtonen's $4 minus Pavelec's $1 salary). On other hand, if the Thrashers were to go the other route and deal Pavelec to fill one roster hole, they would probably want to target a young cheap prospect which would then leave them money to use on the UFA market to fill the remaining roster hole at D or F.
Over at HF Trade Board there have been some talk about a Pavelec for Lupul (PHI) trade which would help Atlanta up front and Philly in goal. One of the biggest problems with such a trade is that Lupul is overpaid at $4.25 per season (more than Kozlov I might point out) and if you acquire him that leaves the team with essentially just $1 million and change to fill their other roster hole--re-signing Salmela eats up the last bit in the budget.
Now if you're the Thrashers and the Flyers call up asking for Pavelec, in return for him I would request a young cheap guy like Giroux ($0.8 million) or Nodl ($0.8 million). The Flyers probably will not want to part with Giroux but I'd certainly ask. If you traded Pavelec for Nodl, that would then leave the team with $4-5 million to acquire a top 4 NHL defensemen.
Another team that might be looking for help in goal is Colorado. Some have suggested a Pavelec for Svatos or Wolski trade might work. If Atlanta acquire Svatos ($2.0 million) that would leave about $4 and if they acquired Wolski ($2.8) that would leave them about $3 for an UFA defenseman.
A third option would be to fill that top six forward with a player taken in this year's NHL draft. If the team feels that a player like Matt Duchesne, Evander Kane or Braydon Schenn could step into a top six role that would leave a significant chunk of cash available for a defenseman. The CBA sets the maximum rookie salary at just over $1 million with roughly $2.5 in potential bonuses. So a rookie like Duchesne or Kane could have a final cap hit of somewhere between $1 million and $3.5 million which would leave more $3-5 million available for a defenseman.
Conclusion: As you can see there are a lot of possibilities. We know the Thrashers probably will only have about $5-6 million to spend on a Forward and Defenseman. We know they will likely trade one goalie. We know they might draft a player who make the NHL immediately. Putting specific names into those slots is a real challenge though.
0 recs |
6 comments
|
Comments
Bogosian
It should be pointed out that since the NHLPA didn’t re-open the CBA, it isn’t set to expire until 2011, which means Bogosian’s rookie bonuses are no longer part of his cap hit heading into the season. His cap hit should only be the rookie contract max of about $1 million. That (in theory) frees up another $2.4 million.
by BenWright on May 29, 2009 9:26 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It is true that the cap bonuses are not automatic like last year.
I wonder how the Thrashers will treat that in their internal budgeting—given how well Bogosian played toward the end of last year I’m wondering if he isn’t more likely to qualify for those bonus clauses? But an extra $2.4 million would certainly allow them to go after some better UFA type players.
by The Falconer on May 29, 2009 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kovalchuk
I think in doing the math you have to look at the strong possibility that Kovalchuk is traded this summer. With a year left on his contract and no apparent ownership interest in making the team competitive in the near turn, you have to assume he’s gone next year for nothing.
Instead this summer the team could get a lot of quality prospects for him and free up a lot of money.
by jonathan_m_peterson on May 29, 2009 9:33 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Trading Kovalchuk and his $6.4 million cap hit would create a large number of possibilities—so many that it is very hard to game plan them out on a blog :(
by The Falconer on May 29, 2009 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t agree with this. I certainly understand the logical argument for it ad why the upside is there, but I don’t believe the team would pull the trigger on such a deal—at least not unless Kovy came out this summer and said point blank “there is absolutely no way I resign with you at the end of the season.”
by godsendjen on May 29, 2009 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not Good
If I’m correct, I rememember Kovy “suggesting” we spend toward the ceiling. I don’t think this is going to be enough
by Whalers on Jun 5, 2009 8:57 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 






















