Trade Deadline: Can Waddell Salvage His Reputation?
If the tenure of Don Waddell ended tomorrow, he would go down in the history of the NHL as another Phil Esposito. That is not a compliment.
Esposito was the first GM on a southern expansion team that had many high draft picks, many low finishes and just one playoff appearance in the team's first decade. Sound familiar Thrasher fans? Compare for a moment the early years of the Tampa Bay Lightning and the early years of the Atlanta Thrashers.
| GM Esposito | Tampa's Finish | GM Waddell | Atlanta's Finish |
| 1992-93 | Out of Playoffs | 1999-2000 | Out of Playoffs |
| 1993-94 | Out of Playoffs | 2000-2001 | Out of Playoffs |
| 1994-95 | Out of Playoffs | 2001-02 | Out of Playoffs |
| 1995-96 | Playoffs | 2002-03 | Out of Playoffs |
| 1996-97 | Out of Playoffs | 2003-04 | Out of Playoffs |
| 1997-98 | Out of Playoffs | 2005-06 | Out of Playoffs |
| 2006-07 | Playoffs | ||
| 2007-08 | Out of Playoffs | ||
| 2008-09 | Out of Playoffs |
My belief is that Don Waddell is a caretaker GM who will be replaced by whichever party wins the lawsuit for ownership of the teams. I suspect that he is charged with doing the best he can without spending much above the salary floor.Given the salary constraints and talent deficit within the organization, It is very unlikely that Don Waddell will still be GM the next time the Thrashers qualify for the playoffs.
However, Don Waddell has an enormous opportunity to construct the talent base that will be the foundation of a contending Thrashers team. There are many important decisions to be made between now and the start of the next NHL season. We have the trade deadline on March 4th, a contract offer to Kovalchuk in this summer, free agency in July, the NHL draft in June and the organizational decision about their goalie of the future. Waddell can either speed or retard progress toward contention depending upon his decisions.
The first big test will be this trade deadline. The Thrashers have already moved Mathieu Schneider for a 2nd round pick (and other conditional picks) which strikes me as a fair return. Pending UFAs Perrin, Havelid and Reasoner could bring needed prospects, draft picks or NHL players.
The key is acquiring young talent that will have an IMPACT at the NHL level. Last year the Thrashers got a mixed bag for Marian Hossa. Colby Armstrong is a great addition and brings much needed grit and leadership. Eric Christensen has been a total bust and occupies a roster spot that could be used to develop a player who has a future in the NHL. The Pittsburgh 1st round pick was used on a player who is a big question mark. Angelo Esposito has had another mixed year in which he struggled with consistency. He has obvious talent, but does he have the hockey sense and determination to be a NHL player? Nobody knows yet.
A year ago Don Waddell retarded the progress of this franchise by failing to auction off veterans like Bobby Holik who could have brought needed draft picks. In the Hossa trade he acquired one quality NHL player, one NHL bust and two question marks who have some upside but are far from a sure thing.
Can the team do better this year? Can Don Waddell find the pieces that will compose the base of the next Thrashers playoff team? Can he rescue his reputation at this late hour? Much of the book on Don Waddell has already been written but the final chapter is still incomplete.
Conclusion: Many things are on the line at the trade deadline. Individual players lives are changed, Stanley Cup contenders are completed, and GMs can make or repair their reputation.
0 recs |
7 comments
|
Comments
I wonder too
If Atlanta were a competitive hockey market, he would have been gone after 3 or 4 years, but we all know we are not. His trade deadline deal in getting Armstrong, Christensen, and Esposito was rated an A-, but looking at it now, I agree it is probably a C or D. He did get a few good ones over the summer. Schneider did his job, so did Reasoner. Williams was a bust for us, but not for Columbus right now. Hainsey, I think was good too. If he had been paired with a better defenseman than Exelby, we would have seen better results from him. So, 1 out of 3 at last year’s deadline, and 3 for 4 over the summer is 57%. Not great, but not bad. I think you are right. He is going to have to do a good job at the deadline. I really hope he is replaced for the draft and UFA market. Our #1 picks are good, but the other ones are questionable. He did pretty well this summer in the UFA market, but we need to make some good moves and build on what we have now. Hopefully, we resign Kovalchuk for a good deal. I think that Kovy is playing better since being made captain, and now that he has a potential linemate in either Little or Peverley. I think that he is learning to adapt with either one. Peverley has been one of the best pickups we made this year. We can thank Anderson and Poile, the GM from Nashville for that one.
by BigThrashFan on Mar 2, 2009 9:34 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I would agree that Waddell made better UFA signings this last summer. I thought Hainsey, Reasoner, Williams all appeared to have real upside. Williams didn’t work out but it seemed like a good deal at the time. The Peverley waiver claim essentially provides what I expected Jason Williams to bring (of course the Peverley addition ended up being too late in the season to help this year).
I also fully encourage the Schneider trade as well. He didn’t play quite as well as hoped but still landed the team a 2nd rounder and mentored Bogosian. If he had played better Schneider might have brought a 1st rounder. It was a good return on a marginal increase in the payroll of just $2 million.
re: Draft picks. Even if we had a new GM next month you’d still have the same scouting staff making the list. A new GM is almost out of time to do any scouting past the 1st or 2nd round guys.
How the Kovalchuk contract plays out over the summer could have a major impact on Waddell’s legacy. I have some thoughts on this that I’ll save for another post.
by The Falconer on Mar 2, 2009 10:56 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Lawsuit winner...
Based on how the recent news froom the lawsuit has been reported, it just sounds like they are determining how the franchise will be valued, not that Belkin can buy out the others at cost. Now, that doesn’t mean that ASG will not sell the Thrashers regardless of the valuation methods. However, I can’t see any type of settlement before the end of the year.
by Blut-0 on Mar 2, 2009 12:34 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Even if the rest of the Spirit Group “wins” the teams they will owe Belkin millions—and they don’t have pockets that deep. So the Spirit group will need to sell Belkin’s chunk to another owner/partner just so they can pay off Belkin what he is owed. That new owner might get a huge stake in the teams like 40-50% and want to name his own GM (assuming he’s interested in hockey).
The other option is that the Spirit Groups sells off the Thrashers (who loose money) with a stipulation to keep them in ATL and fill the building 44 nights a year. Perhaps the Spirit Group will separate with Levenson/Peskowitz owning the hockey side.
A lot of things could happen, but whoever wins will need a new management face to sell “we will contend” to fans. Waddell is not longer credible to most of the fanbase. He’s exhausted his “benefit of the doubt” with virtually everyone including myself.
by The Falconer on Mar 2, 2009 12:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Agree on DW..
Which is too bad because I like him personally.
by Blut-0 on Mar 2, 2009 1:23 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Great post!
Hey Falconer. Long time reader, first time comment.
First off, I agree completely about DW. He could save his reputation, but given the track record, it’s unlikely. We Thrashers fans have sat through promise after promise of better seasons by the GM himself, but only 2007 has sort of come to pass. I don’t consider a tight division lead and no playoffs victory success…is this an exception where beggars can be choosers?
Anyway, I’m getting pretty tired of thinking that DW has finally learned his lesson because we’ve been through it season after season. I will grant you the ownership has given him little options financially, but his trade decisions (or lack thereof) has had little to nothing to do with the ownership. No need to mention Coburn. I think that’s one instance where Don Waddell actually screwed over our ownership by overpaying Zhitnik, Zhitnik underperforming, and ultimately paying him to recline on his La-Z-Boy for a couple years to come. Also, we used that 1st round pick from Pittsburgh to draft a kid that is not totally likely to ever play in the NHL. The kid’s focused on school, not hockey. Angelo Esposito may end up looking like a Jim Slater at best, but nothing is definite. We all saw what Alex Bourret did for us, and what trading him for Joe Motzko did for us.
Basically, Don Waddell may make a good move before the deadline, but he won’t earn his salvation as general manager of the Thrashers. I don’t trust him, and he’s past the point of no return in my books.
I’ve been a long time reader, Falconer. Thanks for all you post here. It’s great stuff.
http://chicagothrash.surrendered.org - Chi-Town Thrash
Member of the massive Blackhawks fan bandwagon since...never.
by KovyRev on Mar 2, 2009 3:13 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for the kind words KovyRev.
I’m in favor of a new GM, but I also recognize that Don has done some good things. Most of his trades have worked to the Thrashers advantage IMO, but the Coburn disaster over shadows that fact. We will never know how much of that trade was up to DW and how much was because of pressure from ownership.
His UFA moves this last summer were much better last summer than in previous years. He went with youth (Hainsey) and avoided handing out long deals to old guys. I approve. But some I just wonder about this organization’s ability to evaluate talent at the NHL level. Guys like Christensen, Zhitnik, Niko Kapanen, etc just make me shake my head.
I’d rather see us go the route of LA Kings. The Kings have stock piled lots of draft picks the last three NHL drafts. They have something more than 10 picks for the 2009 Draft and there are only 7 rounds. Having picks gives you options. The GM could potentially flip a pair of 2nd rounders for a useful NHL roster player down the road.
by The Falconer on Mar 2, 2009 5:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 























